Dog Safety Games

A couple of months ago, I got an email from the Humane Education coordinator of the Animal Protective Association of Missouri, who wanted to know whether they might be able to use the Dog Safety coloring pages that I had created when I went to teach Dog Safety at the local Catholic school here in Upstate New York. Of course I told her she would be more than welcome to, and asked her what they were planning to do with the coloring pages, if they were going to just hand them out as coloring pages.

Michelle, the coordinator, ended up turning the coloring pages into a “board” game for the kids to play, which is an absolutely fantastic idea that I definitely want to share. If anyone would like to run with this and use the board game to teach dog safety at their child’s school or as part of a humane education program, I don’t believe that the APA would mind it if you “stole” their idea – and you’re certainly welcome to my artwork. That’s what I created it for, after all.

Michelle used colored foam floor tiles – the kind sold for children’s play rooms – to create the “board” for this game, with each tile representing a “square”. The game started off with the coloring page of a child meeting a dog, which instructed the child to move forward to the next page, which offered more instructions on how to properly meet a dog. After being shown by the images how to ask permission from both the owner and the dog, and how to pet nicely, they then used the “don’t do this” pages to ask children – “Should you …” and giving them the option to choose “yes” or “no”. When they selected the wrong answer, they were asked to go back two tiles. When they selected the right answer, they were able to move forward toward the end of the game.

Michelle even sent me some photos of the game and kids playing it.

Dog Safety Game

Start

Following the Instructions

Kids who completed the Dog Safety Game received a certificate with their name on it at the end, and I’m sure they had lots of fun playing the game and learning how to be safe around dogs. It’s actually a shame, I think, that dog safety isn’t routinely taught in schools as part of the regular curriculum. I’m sure that many bites would be prevented if children knew not to bother a dog while it is eating and that it’s never a good idea to try and pet a dog that is chained up or behind a fence. (Sadly, many adults do not know how to be safe around dogs, either, and therefore don’t teach their kids.)

To see all of the Dog Safety coloring pages, including some extras created specifically for this game, click here.

A couple of days after I completed the artwork for the Dog Safety Game, the coordinator for the Spartanburg Humane Society in South Carolina emailed me and asked me if I could illustrate a different model of safe dog introductions for their humane education program. Their model is based on this video from Karen Pryor Clicker Training – Dogs Like Kids They Feel Safe With. I just recently finished that set of illustrations and they are available as coloring pages here for your use.

 

Interact

If you’ve used any of my materials to teach Dog Safety at your school or Humane Society, or you have ideas or suggestions on how to get kids engaged or improve my coloring pages, please share them. I would love to see  how these are working for you or, if you don’t use them, what materials you use to teach Dog Safety in your community.

 

Coming Soon

A few years ago, I created a set of charts showing the anatomy, patterns, and colors of the German Shepherd Dog. Some of you may remember seeing them on my blog and some of you may have seen them elsewhere on the Internet because they’ve been redistributed over and over, often edited and generally without any kind of copyright notice or link back to me accompanying them. If you think about it, that’s kind of sad – here’s a set of educational graphics being made available for the very low price of leaving the artwork intact as it was originally created and adding a link back to the original creator. It’s not like I’m charging money and you wouldn’t think it’s too much to ask, but, apparently, for some people, it is.

So, a while ago, I sat down and created an entirely different set of these charts. This new set is not only nicer than the old one, but I’m also taking steps to ensure they won’t wind up all over the Internet without my permission. I realize copyright text and watermarks on images can be annoying, but at some point, you really have to draw the line and protect your copyright – especially if you plan on selling them through your online store. (There are way too many stories of artwork being ripped off and sold for a profit – as a matter of fact, there are whole eBay stores that deal in nothing but artwork stolen from DeviantArt and even locally, I’ve found that a business offering screen printing has been taking art from DeviantArt and other sources and selling it for a profit!)

This new set – previous of which are below – will be available in the near future (as in, when I can find the time to upload them and get them all set up in a variety of formats) in my Zazzle store. The individual dog graphics will also be available in a customizable format where you’ll be able to add the background color of your choice to postcards, as well as custom text to some of the other products. So if you like my artwork and would love to have, say, a mug or mouse pad with the dog that most closely resembles your own, you’ll be able to do that. No promises regarding how soon they will be available, but hopefully I can get the time to upload them all in the very near future.

You can click onto the preview images to see them at a slightly larger size, but I apologize up front if the more extensive charts, especially the Colors of the German Shepherd Dog chart, are not easily legible on your screen. I’ve scaled them down quite a bit for sharing online and the watermark obviously takes away from the image as well. I hope you find them interesting for reference regardless. The printed versions will be much higher-quality images and obviously will not feature the watermarks.

Canine Anatomy - Malinois Version

Dog Anatomy - German Shepherd Version

Patterns & Colors of the Belgian Malinois

Patterns of the German Shepherd Dog

Colors of the German Shepherd Dog

On a side note, if you are the editor of a dog-related magazine and would like to use these in your printed publication, please contact me via email (link is above left on my page) for further information. They are available for a small fee and a copy of your publication, provided that you will not post them in an online version of your magazine where people could take and redistribute the graphics. (If you live in Dubai, look for some of my charts in “Animal World” pet magazine.)

Tell Me You’re Joking

In the best interest of my blood pressure, I try not to spend an awful lot of time ranting about the sheer dog-related stupidity I see, hear, and read about on what seems to be an everyday basis, and generally limit my commentary to one or two sentences when I post dog-related news to our Facebook page. I figure the stupidity often speaks for itself without my pointing out the obvious, which is often the case in local Craig’s List ads, forum posts, and news articles. Some pretty good examples would be people looking for a stud for their one-year-old, mixed-breed female; the people asking for help with “aggression” issues in their 13-week-old puppies, and people asking the newspaper dog columnists what the purpose of training the recall is.

But every once in a while, a story comes along that makes me – as the saying goes – want to “high-five someone. In the face. With a chair.” This story about a family dog being shot in the face by a neighbor is one of those stories.

Let me first state the obvious in case it isn’t so obvious – there is never a good reason to shoot a dog with the exception of the following two cases : a) a dog that is actually attacking you or a member of your family, and, b) a dog that is attacking your dog or your livestock. I will never condemn anyone who pulls out a legally-owned firearm and shoots a dog that is actively attacking a member of their family or their livestock because that is a situation where defense is, in my opinion, perfectly warranted. (Of course, I’d prefer if you tried other methods to stop the dog from attacking, but that’s a whole different discussion.)

What is never okay is shooting a dog that’s just trampling around your yard. Yes, it’s annoying. I don’t like loose or stray dogs in my yard, either. I also don’t like finding dog poops in my yard that didn’t originate from my own dog. And I certainly would hate for a well-tended garden to be trampled (and devoured) by the neighbor’s dog, if I had a well-tended garden (which I don’t.) But none of those things necessitate shooting the dog as there’s no threat to anyone’s life or limb.

There are a number of perfectly appropriate ways in which a neighbor could deal with a dog-owning neighbor whose dogs are allowed to run at large and destroy your yard. The most obvious of these would be to go to your neighbor’s home and tell them their dogs are tearing up your yard, but the majority of people won’t choose this option because it usually leads to a confrontation or argument with the dog-owning neighbor, and most of us don’t want to “get into it” with our neighbors. The second option would have been to call animal control or, where no such service is available, the dog warden or local police, when the dogs are in your yard so that they may come and issue a citation to the dogs’ owner. Another option would be to present the dog-owning neighbor with a bill to cover the damages that their dogs have done to your yard – or, if they don’t respond to that, take them to small claims court to sue them for the cost of damages and repairs.

In the case of our dog-shooting neighbor here, they sent an anonymous note to the dog owners – “If your dogs come into my garden for the third time, you will never see your dogs again,” is what it said, according to the article. If I received a threat such as this one in my mailbox, I’d probably let the police know and I’d definitely make sure that my dogs aren’t running loose, but I don’t suppose either of those options occurred to these dog-owning neighbors. In fact, their response to the news agency is more than just a little lackadaisical – “I can’t do anything until we actually build a fence and the neighbours know that.”

If that’s not being a bad neighbor, then I don’t know what is. These folks moved into the neighborhood with their two very large dogs six weeks before this shooting happened, and they immediately became “those neighbors with their out-of-control dogs” because they just let their dogs run loose in their unfenced yard. Way to make an impression. Their explanation of the situation is that they really can’t keep their dogs from tearing up the neighborhood gardens because they haven’t actually built a fence yet, and the neighbors know that, so they’re not really seeing the problem here. After all, it’s impossible to contain a dog if you don’t have a fence, so the neighbors just need to deal until they find the time and money to build fences.

Really? Are you kidding me?

Let me tell you something: I do not have a fenced yard. I haven’t had a fenced yard in all the years that I have owned dogs. Not once. I didn’t have a fenced yard in the town house where I lived in southern Virginia when I fostered for rescue. I didn’t have a fenced yard in the apartment I lived in in northern Virginia when I had just Abby. I didn’t have a fenced yard in the duplex we moved to after that, when we had both Abby and Ronja. I didn’t have a fenced yard in the log home we lived in 45 minutes from the Canadian border, and we don’t have a fenced yard in our current home. Not once have I ever just let my dog out and expected my neighbors to “just deal” with her running loose. Not once.

Know why? Because my dogs are either leashed and I’m with them, or they’re trained to come back when called and I’m with them. It’s really that easy to keep your dog from being a nuisance – leash them or train them. And always, always, always be outside with them, even if you do have a fenced yard. (Remember all those questions I’ve answered about nuisance behaviors such as fence fighting, howling, digging, and other nuisance behaviors dogs engage in when left alone in fenced yards? Yeah. Dogs don’t like to be relegated outside on their own and they’ll find things to do if they’re not supervised. Kinda like toddlers.)

So I have very little patience for these owners who pretty much figured their whole neighborhood should just deal with their loose dogs and who really didn’t care a whole lot, even after receiving an anonymous threat from a neighbor against the lives of their dogs. (Seriously – if someone threatens your dogs’ life, why in the heck wouldn’t you keep them contained?)

The owner seems to have attempted (and I use that word loosely) to contain her dogs. She tells the newspaper, “I’ve tried chaining the dogs up but they just snap the chains.” I suppose walking them leashed and supervising them wasn’t an option. Even so, heavier chains or better quality probably would have been an option. Heck, even some heavy-duty rope from the hardware store probably would have been an option. But I guess they didn’t want to bother with trying different options if the first attempt didn’t work.

And the vet’s comment, while not related to the stupidity of either the shooter or the dog owner, just makes me shake my head and wonder how this made it into the article. Speaking about the bullet the dog was shot with, the vet said, “it didn’t explode.” Someone obviously needs to explain to the vet the difference between expanding bullets and exploding bullets. Actual exploding bullets are pretty uncommon and illegal in many places, including a number of states in the US. I would think that, with Australia’s tougher gun laws, they’d be illegal in Australia as well. Of course, I’m pretty sure the vet meant to say “expanding” and not “exploding”, anyway, but he probably doesn’t know the difference.

Posted in all. 1 Comment »

Body Language

Let’s talk canine body language.

What do you see in this photograph of a little boy named Lucas and his Service Dog, Juno?

I see a dog who obviously adores this little boy. She is leaned toward him, snuggling her head close. Her eyes are partially closed. She obviously doesn’t mind the death-grip hug he has on her, either. And all the other photographs of Juno and Lucas suggest that, indeed, they’re extremely close and that she adores this little boy. They’re all photos of Juno nestled close, seeking body contact and snuggling up to him. (That’s a very Malinois thing, in my experience.)

Although I generally don’t advocate hugging dogs – and certainly never dogs you don’t know – it’s obvious from Juno’s body language and signals that she doesn’t mind this interaction. So this would be a good example of a friendly, relaxed dog who presents no risk of biting.

What about this photo, taken at this police K-9′s retirement ceremony?

I see a dog that is very clearly uncomfortable with what is going on here. The dog’s handler has a tight grip on him but is completely oblivious to the signs and signals the dog is giving – all of which may be a warning that the dog may be about to bite the man on the right, who is leaning toward the dog, touching the dog, and making eye contact. The dog is obviously not comfortable with this behavior and he is giving a whole host of signs to show that he is uncomfortable.

This dog is leaning away from the person on the right, who is acting in a manner the dog perceives as threatening. His ears are “wonky”, maybe the photographer captured a quick ear flick. The dog is also giving a nose lick and is avoiding eye contact with the man on the right. All of those are signs of stress and discomfort – signs that let the handler know the dog should be removed from the situation or, if the signs are ignored, a bite may follow.

What about this video?

Watch it in slow-motion, and you will see everything that went wrong here. At 2 seconds into the video, the reporter pats Petro, the police dog, on top of the head. You’ll see Pedro ducking and licking his lips. Two signs that he is not comfortable with this kind of interaction and that the reporter is much too close. Pedro then looks up at the reporter, who is staring right into his face. You can see that Pedro is actually kind of leaning away from the reporter as he then leans in to the dog, grabs him on both sides of the neck, and attempts to probably kiss him. At this, Pedro lunges and bites because all of his other signals have been ignored by both the reporter and the handler.

Sadly, Colleen Pelar’s website no longer has the videos of dogs exhibiting stress signals on it since it got a makeover, but it now has some other useful resources found here, including the six common stress signals (which makes a nice bookmark, too), and the dog behavior continuum showing the difference between enjoyment, tolerance, and “enough already” expressions in dogs.

Why This Is Stupid

Back in November, I reported on a blog post by Mayor Graham of Watertown, New York, in which he advocated banning all dogs from any public events, as well as from within 20 feet of any public playground, pool, or sports field, in response to one very sad and unfortunate accident that happened at the Watertown Farmer’s Market in August.

I realized back then that introducing such a measure in Watertown would have wider implications if it were to pass – in particular, that other towns in New York and across the United States would look at is as a case example and attempt to introduce similar laws in their locations, just like dangerous dog and breed-specific legislation have been sweeping this country from one coast to the other. Sadly for New York, councilwoman Roxanne Burns introduced Roxy’s Law, legislation that would make it illegal for dog owners to bring their dogs to any public events in the city. The law reads in part,

It shall be unlawful for the owner of any dog to permit or allow such dog to be present at any “Special Event” in the City or to be upon City owned property and within 20 feet of any City owned swimming pool or playground equipment located within any City park or playground. For purposes of this section, a “Special Event” shall mean the following activities upon City owned property: The Farm & Craft Market; The 4th of July Concert at Thompson Park; or The Jefferson County Fair. A “Special Event” shall also include any other specifically approved event conducted, at least in part, upon City owned property and which will or may involve significant public assembly.

Although there was significant public outcry, including television and newspaper interviews, a petition and accompanying Facebook page, and dog owners who went to the council meetings to oppose the measure, it passed in the middle of January and now all dogs are banned from public events unless they are “confined within an automobile, crate, cage or similar structure” or they fall under one of New York’s categories of “Dogs of Service”, which include not only Service Dogs for persons with disabilities, but also Search-and-Rescue Dogs, Therapy Dogs, military working dogs, and police K-9′s.

(My readers, like me, may appreciate the irony that the councilwoman who introduced and pushed this legislation, Roxanne Burns, was arrested for aggravated DWI in December after driving her car into a railing and fleeing the scene with a BAC of 0.20, nearly three times the legal limit. The irony here lies in the fact that drunk drivers kill and injure more people each year than dogs ever do … yet councilwoman Burns managed to get dogs banned based on one bite incident in the town, yet presents a much greater danger to the citizens of the town than the handful of dogs attending events do.)

Anyway. Now that this precedent has been set in the town of Watertown, the nearby town of Carthage has proposed a similar ban, which will be heard this upcoming Monday.

I am a lot more interested in what happens in Carthage than what happens in Watertown because it is closer to home. Carthage is where I go to my doctors’ appointments, my dance classes, my takeout food places, my Farmer’s Market, and also where I work. As a result, I spend a lot more time in Carthage than Watertown. Carthage is also much smaller than Watertown – it’s Smalltown, USA. People like going to things with their dogs and their kids in tow more here than they do in Watertown, and events are not nearly as busy in Carthage as they are in Watertown – there are probably less people lining the streets for parades than there are in the parade. Needless to say, a ban here would affect me as a responsible dog owner.

That all said, I’d like to make a few points to say why these dog bans are pointless and won’t prevent dog bites within the town limits at all. I would love to say these things to the town council in person, but I won’t be able to. I’ve only just found out there will be a town meeting on Monday to address this, and I have two dog training clients that I meet on Monday at the same time.


Fact 1

Carthage does not have a “Dog Bite Problem”

In the past year I’ve worked in Emergency Medicine in this town, we have never once taken a person to the hospital with a dog bite – neither a child nor an adult. We have taken plenty of people for other reasons that are just as preventable as a dog bite – intoxication, drunk driving, assault, overdose, prescription and illegal drug abuse, and a long list of other completely preventable medical reasons. Out of the things that are a threat to the public in Carthage, dog bites are essentially non-existent.


Fact 2

The chance of being bitten at a public event is negligible.

I know that we hear and read a lot about dog bites – especially since the same stories seem to hit many different news outlets at the same time. But is there really a dog bite epidemic in the United States? The Center for Disease Control does not think so.

Although an average of 885,000 people seek medical attention for dog bites each year – that includes visits to the family doctor for an infection caused by a bite, as well as serious bites – and this number sounds extremely high, consider that in just February 2012, more than 1.5 million people had to seek medical attention of all kinds after being injured in vehicle crashes, according the to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. In fact, the CDC points out that dog bites to children between newborn and four years of age have been steadily decreasing over recent years. The CDC further finds that the majority of dog bites occur to people who have dogs in their own homes, and the American Humane Association points out that 67% (two out of three) dog bites happen to a person on their own property, and usually are caused by a dog that they know (such as their own dogs or a neighbor’s dog).

Based on the statistics above, we can assume that 33% of all dog bites happen outside the dog owner’s property – but there do not appear to be any statistics that break this down further. We don’t know, for example, how many people are bitten at dog parks each year while attempting to break up dog fights. Or how many people are bitten by dogs that have escaped their yards and are running loose. How how many dogs bite people at dog shows each year. I would particularly be interested in the latter number because you would logically assume that the number of dog bites are greater at dog events or dog shows because you have a large crowd of people and a large crowd of dogs in the same, often indoor, areas.

Suffice it to draw the following two conclusions -

ONE -> When it comes to the likelihood of being injured, the average American is more likely to be injured while driving their car (or riding in a car) for a single month than they are to be injured by a dog bite all year long. The average American is also more likely to be the subject of domestic violence.

TWO -> The likelihood of being bitten by a dog at an event that is crowded with people (and other dogs) is nearly negligibly small compared to the likelihood of being bitten by your own family dog (or a family member’s dog) in your or their own home.

Therefore, this type of legislation does not, will not, and can not prevent dog bites.


Fact 3

This legislation will hurt the town of Carthage

As I mentioned above, Carthage is the proverbial Smalltown, USA. Like many small towns, Carthage no longer has a whole lot to offer – a grocery store, a gun shop, a few places to get food and a couple of places to pick up knick-nacks, along with the Farmer’s Market and a few, select events throughout the year. Most people, unfortunately, already have to rely on outlying, larger towns for the majority of their shopping as well as for the majority of events.

One of the nice things Carthage did have going for itself was the fact that the events were not as busy, leaving plenty of room to bring your dog to the neighborhood parade without being in anyone’s way, or walking down to the Farmer’s Market to pick up a few thing. (As a matter of fact, some of the Farmers Market vendors brought their dogs, too.)

I don’t and won’t presume to speak for the dog owners living in Carthage, but as far as I am concerned, I would most likely stop attending parades and other outdoor events unless I am a participant if I cannot bring my dog. And instead of talking a nice walk to the Farmer’s Market with my dog to pick up some fresh-grown produce, I’d just shop at the commissary because, at that point, it would just be about getting groceries, and I can do that plenty of places. I don’t need to take a special trip to the Farmer’s Market that’s only on once a week.

I expect that other Carthage dog owners feel the same way, as I’ve seen some of them interviewed on TV.


Fact 4

Banning dogs from events promotes bad dog ownership

I know that many of the proponents of the dog ban love to say that no dog really wants to be in a crowded public place and that the best thing owners could do for their pups would be to leave them at home in a fenced yard, where they belong. This shows exactly that these folks have absolutely no idea of what a dog would want – or even what a dog’s actual needs are.

Dogs are and always will be, pack animals. Pack animals are happy when they are with their pack, whether that’s their humans or a group of other dogs. Dogs are never happy confined and isolated to a back yard day in and day out. (As a matter of fact, a quarter of all fatal dog bites are caused by dogs chained up outside.) While not every dog enjoys crowds, the majority of dogs prefer being out with their humans at a parade over being stuck alone in yards – just ask the many people who’ve emailed me to figure out how to deal with their dogs’ unwanted boredom behaviors, such as digging, barking or howling, and escaping.

But, providing a dog a safe place at home isn’t necessarily irresponsible – most of us do it while we are at work. What is truly irresponsible is suggesting that dogs are welcome at events if they are “confined to a vehicle” or cage. It’s that vehicle part that’s especially ludicrous, considering that New York already has a law on the books that makes it illegal to leave an animal in a car.


Fact 5

Banning dogs from events hurts responsible dog owners

This is kind of a “duh” statement, but I think it’s important to include it. The majority of dogs I have met at events have belonged to people who were knowledgeable about dogs and wanted to give their dogs every opportunity to be well-socialized, comfortable in all situations, and a good ambassador for their respective breed. Many I’ve met are active with their dogs in one venue or another, whether that is herding or conformation shows or therapy work or just plain old obedience training.

Most I’ve spoken to have been bringing their dogs since they were young puppies, ensuring they were well-socialized and able to stay obedient under a lot of distractions. And, let’s face it, that not-so-busy corner on the parade route is fantastic to work on proofing obedience training! Where else do you get flags, bands, balloons, fire trucks, and a whole slew of other weird things and loud noises at the same time?


Fact 6

Persons with Disabilities

Lastly, as a Service Dog advocate, the way the law is currently written in Watertown, and the way the law is being proposed in Carthage, leaves a sour taste in my mouth. The law reads as follows,

There shall be excluded from this section any owner of a dog which is defined under Section 108 of the New York Agriculture and Markets Law, as the same may be amended from time to time, as a guide dog, hearing dog, service dog, working search dog, therapy dog, detection dog, war dog, or any other dog which may be utilized by law enforcement agencies within the jurisdiction of the City, or which are professionally trained service animals utilized by persons with disabilities.

You may notice that this last sentence has some bold text – specifically, that it says that the law does not apply to Service Animal that are professionally trained. You may find it interesting that the Americans with Disabilities Act, which covers all of the information pertinent to Service Dogs, makes absolutely no note of any requirement that Service Dogs must be trained professionally. As a matter of fact, in the United States, Service Dogs can be trained by their owner, a friend, a trainer they’ve picked from the phone book, or a Service Dog organization. As long as the person who is with the dog has a disability that qualifies for a Service Dog and the dog has been trained to do specific tasks, plural, for this person, the dog is a Service Dog.

This potentially opens a whole can of worms for legitimately disabled person with legitimate Service Dogs who may find themselves challenged at an event, either by staff or by police, to provide proof that their dog is a Service Dog and that the dog has been professionally trained – neither of which can be legally required as per the ADA.

Even more interesting is the New York Agriculture and Markets Law, which is listed above and which excludes certain types of dogs, including Service Dogs but also Police Dogs, Detector Dogs, Therapy Dogs, and Search-and-Rescue Dogs. The actual law that includes all of the definitions can be found here, but here’s something that’s of particular note, and that is paragraph 123b. This states,

(a) “Service animal” shall mean any animal that has been partnered with a person who has a disability and has been trained or is being trained, by a qualified person, to aid or guide a person with a disability.

Note that it says “is being trained by a qualified person.” This means that not only the disabled handler and his trained Service Dog are covered under the New York law, but also a qualified person who is training a dog for the (future) benefit of a disabled person. So now you’ve got the fact that you are already not allowed to demand proof of training or certification for a Service Dog, but also the fact that anyone could say they are qualified to train a Service Dog and are training the dog, which makes things even harder both for the event staff personnel and police trying to enforce these types of laws and persons with legitimate Service Dogs who will be hassled to no end any time they decide to attend an event.

Don’t think it happens? Google “Service Dog certification” or “Service Dog registration” and see how may businesses you come up with from whom you can order a Service Dog ID tag, vest, and certificate for under $200 to pass your very own dog off as a Service Dog or Service Dog in Training. Or just search my blog or Google for “Service Dog fraud” or “fake Service Dog” to come up with some instances where fakers have been encountered and exposed, both in the media and by bloggers. Because it does happen – a lot. And laws like these make it more likely to happen while at the same time making it also more likely that real persons with disabilities are hassled more in public because they rely on their dogs.

 

Bottom line – banning dogs from public events won’t make a difference in the amount of bites that occur and it’s not anywhere near being an important issue for lawmakers to tackle, especially considering more pressing issues that should receive their attention.

 

There’s also only one way to prevent dog bites – teach people to be safe around dogs.

I know that sounds like another “duh” moment, but many people really don’t know how to be safe around a dog. I’ve had grown adults sneak up behind my dog and reach down suddenly for a quick pet without ever asking me. I’ve had parents tell their toddlers that it’s okay to go pet my dog without asking me, the dog’s owner. I’ve had kids hang around my dog’s neck, grab her whiskers, touch her tongue, yank on her ears, because nobody has ever told them that this is not ever appropriate behavior with a dog, even one they know. I’ve found that children who have dogs at home are frequently the worst offenders, telling me that their dog “loves this” as they yank my dog’s facial fur about like a ragdoll, because they are allowed to treat their dog like a living toy at home. And yes, I’ve seen adults do plenty of stupid things, too. Like getting right into a dog’s space, hugging, grabbing all over the face, even kissing the dog on the nose.

This video featuring news anchor Kyle Dyer and a dog named Max graphically demonstrates just how stupid people who claim to love animals (but know little about them) act around dogs – Kyle was in his space, rubbing all over his face, crowding in more and more, and then moved in to kiss him on the nose. In this case, the dog gave tons of signals showing his discomfort – stressed panting, tight lips, ear flicks, leaning away, turning his head, tongue flicks and, in the end, teeth and then a bite – that were ignored by both the news anchor and the dog owner.

This bite, like just about all dog bites, were perfectly preventable. Not by banning dogs  from the studio. Or from events. But by educating people – especially people who interact with dogs that do not belong to them – about how to properly interact with a dog. Bottom line … if it isn’t yours, you should probably keep your hands to yourself. That goes for me, my house, my car, and yes … my dog. My dog is not a plush animal outside for your personal amusement. And if people keep their hands to themselves, the chances of getting bitten are pretty small indeed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 120 other followers